Legal Opinion

AR-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 6918SC173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

In entering into and undertaking to perform the contract alleged in the complaint, plaintiff was clearly subject to the provisions of G.S., Chap. 87, Art. 1. For purposes of that Article, G.S. 87-1 defines a general contractor as “one who for a fixed price, commission, fee or wage, undertakes to bid upon or to construct any building, ... or any improvement or structure where the cost of the undertaking is twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) or more and anyone who shall bid upon or engage in constructing any undertakings or improvements above mentioned in the State of North Carolina costing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brady v. FulghumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Helms v. DawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Barrett, Robert & Woods, Inc. v. ArmiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Currin & Currin Construction, Inc. v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Holland v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API