Legal Opinion

Helms v. Dawkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1977No. 7620SC756PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error summary judgment entered for defendants.

It is well settled in North Carolina that a general contractor within the meaning of G.S. 87-1 who has no license or who constructs a project the value of which exceeds the amount of his license may not recover for the owner’s breach of the contract, or for the value of the work and services furnished or materials supplied under the contract on the theory of unjust enrichment. Builders Supply v. Midyette, 274 N.C. 264, 162 S.E. 2d 507 (1968); Furniture Mart v. Burns, 31 N.C. App. 626, 230 S.E. 2d 609 (1976);…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Fulton v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. AR-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Hickory Furniture Mart, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HeffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Sample v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Hodgson Construction, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Revis Sand & Stone, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Mill-Power Supply Co. v. CVM ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API