Legal Opinion

Currin & Currin Construction, Inc. v. Lingerfelt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2003No. COA02-941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Currin & Currin Construction, Inc. (“plaintiff’) appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of James Eric Lingerfelt (“defendant James”) and Jana Carole Lingerfelt (collectively “defendants”). We affirm since plaintiff is barred from recovering on the construction contract entered into by the parties because plaintiff did not have a valid general contractor’s license at the time the contract was formed.

In May of 1999, Durane Currin (“Currin”), President of plaintiff, orally agreed that plaintiff would construct a house for defendants on a “cost plus” basis. In a letter dated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Triad Women's Center, P.A. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Jones v. Durham Anesthesia Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Country Boys Auction & Realty Co. v. Carolina Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Sood v. SoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API