Legal Opinion

Holland v. Walden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 7126SC39PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

By contracting with defendants and undertaking to construct a house for them at the agreed price of $67,500.00, plaintiff became a “general contractor” and engaged in the business of general contracting in this State within the definition contained in G.S. 87-1. Thereby she became subject to the licensing provisions of G.S. 87-10. Unless she substantially complied with those provisions, she may not recover against defendants either on her contract or upon quantum meruit. Builders Supply v. Midyette, 274 N.C. 264, 162 S.E. 2d 507; Construction Co. v. Anderson, 5 N.C. App. 12, 168…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Tillman v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. AR-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brady v. FulghumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Barrett, Robert & Woods, Inc. v. ArmiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hickory Furniture Mart, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Phillips v. PartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. C. C. Walker Grading & Hauling, Inc. v. S. R. F. Management Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API