Rappaport v. Boyer & Gilfillan Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of 100 truck engines. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the denial of his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Resolving all conflicts and doubts in favor of plaintiff, the prevailing party, the facts appear to be as follows: Plaintiff, an automobile parts dealer, was under contract with the United States government to furnish, among other items, a number of truck engines suitable for installation in 1942 Ford army trucks. Plaintiff inquired of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shippen v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kassmir v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Carpenter v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Pemberton v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY v. Tesmer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Floen v. SundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Kramer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Fieve v. EmmeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.