Legal Opinion

Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1930No. 27,905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while a passenger of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The court granted the motion of the defendant for a new trial and later denied the plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order granting the new trial. The plaintiff appeals from both orders.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial was upon the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law. An order granting a motion for a new trial, when there has not been a like order before because of insufficiency of evidence, after a first trial, made upon the grounds…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Weiss v. MoriartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Students Book Co. v. SemerjianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API