Legal Opinion
Biro v. Hill
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 6, 1994No. 14992PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs appeal1 challenging the action of the trial court, Rush, J., denying their motion for reconsideration of a judgment of nonsuit previously rendered against them, and denying their motion to set aside that judgment.2 In this appeal, the plaintiffs challenge: (1) the rendition of the original judgment of nonsuit; (2) the denial of their motion to set aside that judgment; and (3) the denial of their motion to reconsider both the judgment of nonsuit and the denial of their motion to open the judgment of nonsuit.3 After full and careful consideration of the relevant portions of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Shore v. Haverson Architecture & Design, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- McFarline v. MickensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.