Legal Opinion

McFarline v. Mickens

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 10, 2017No. AC39339PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Ellen McFarline, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Patrick W. Mickens, Jr., administrator of the estate of Janet Mickens (Mickens). The plaintiff claims that the court, in granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment, erred by (1) failing to consider the pleadings, affidavits and other proof submitted in deciding that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact; (2) considering facts outside the confines of this case; (3) violating her right to due process of law by failing to allow…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Konover v. KolakowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Houghtaling v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Park City Sports, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Cyr v. VKB, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Mikucka v. St. Lucian's Residence, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API