Legal Opinion

DiPalma v. Wiesen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 1972PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff Lillian Banks, along with two other plaintiffs, brought this action to recover for injuries and damages which she had suffered while a passenger in a vehicle driven by a companion plaintiff. She alleged that the collision, on February 3, 1967, between the vehicle in which she was a passenger and the vehicle operated by the defendant Eve C. Wiesen was caused by the latter’s negligence. During the course of the trial, the defendants admitted liability but contested the extent of damages. A jury returned a verdict for the plain*295tiffs and the defendants appealed from the judgment for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API