Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Clearing MacHine Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1985No. 01800PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

Before us is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County sustaining the preliminary objections of Kelsey-Hayes Company, Heintz Division (“Kelsey-Hayes”), appellee herein and additional defendant below, and dismissing Kelsey-Hayes from the instant action. The issue before us concerns to what extent the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (“Act”) 1 insulates Kelsey-Hayes, as an additional defendant, from common law liability, on a claim of the original defendants, for allegedly “intentional, wanton and willful” conduct resulting in serious…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Readinger v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Evans v. Allentown Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Joyce v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. First Realvest, Inc. v. Avery Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Whitmer v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API