Legal Opinion

Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1989No. 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 W.D. Appeal Dockets, 1988PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the question of whether there exists an exception to the exclusivity provision of the Occupational Disease Act (“ODA”)1 for injuries to employees caused by the alleged intentional misconduct of their employer. The appellees, the plaintiffs below, instituted this action against their former and/or current employer2 appellant Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“PCC” or “Pittsburgh Corning”) and its parent corporations to recover damages for asbestos related diseases they allegedly contracted while employed at PCC’s Port Allegheny Plant.

The initial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Leahey v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mt. Lebanon v. County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Readinger v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Schweitzer v. Rockwell InternationalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API