Legal Opinion

Readinger v. Gottschall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 316PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The chief question raised by this appeal is whether there can be a recovery in a trespass action by an employe for an assault upon him by his employers. . This question has not heretofore reached our appellate courts but this is the second case in which a common pleas court has held that there can be a recovery. The cases in other jurisdictions are divided.

Mrs. Readinger, the wife-plaintiff, after working for the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Gottschall, from May 9 to 11, 1958, was told by telephone on May 12th .that her services were no longer required and that she should come…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mauchline v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Heskett v. Fisher Laundry & Cleaners Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Collier v. Wagner Castings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Heilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API