Legal Opinion

LERAMAN v. Rudolph

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1964No. Appeal, 266PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellant filed an. action.of. assumpsit against David M. Rudolph, individually and Trading as David M. Rudolph Agency [Rudolph] and Life Assurance Co. of Pa. [Life] seeking the recovery of certain renewal commissions allegedly owing to him. His complaint recited that he had entered into a written contract, a copy of which was attached to the complaint, with both defendants, providing for his employment in the sale of insurance policies written by Life, Rudolph being Life’s general agent. He further averred that, after about three and one-half years, his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaufman Hotel & Restaurant Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. McKnight v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Banyas v. Lower Bucks HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API