Legal Opinion

Tietjen v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 28, 1975No. 1179-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

Wilmer M. Tietjen appeals from a judgment granting the motion of the Department of Labor and Industries to dismiss his claim on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence to support a jury verdict. Claimant Tietjen’s testimony relating to psychiatric disability was stricken following his failure to comply with an order of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals requiring a CR 35 psychiatric examination, at the department’s request.

Tietjen contends that refusal to be examined without his wife’s presence was not a violation of the order, that it was error to order such an examination 2%…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Staton v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Shea v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Mitchell v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Strafford v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. US SEC. Ins. Co. v. CiminoSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Langfeldt-Haaland v. Saupe Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API