Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Staton v. Common Pleas Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1965No. 39650PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The respondents, Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County and Judge Holden, a member thereof, were vested with jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action by statute. Sections 4123.01 to 4123.99 of the Revised Code of *19Ohio. The relatrix voluntarily submitted herself to this jurisdiction in order to secure the benefits provided by the Workmen’s Compensation Act for injured employees.

It follows, therefore, that the Court of Common Pleas has jurisdiction of both the subject matter of the action and the person of the relatrix in the cause now pending before it.

The authorities appear to be in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. State ex rel. GellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Garrison v. BroughOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Burtzlaff v. VickeryOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Booth v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API