Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Mohr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1904No. 13,633PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Doniphan district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J..:

Plaintiffs in error were directors in the Wathena State Bank and defendant in error brought this action against them to recover deposits made by him in that bank, it having become insolvent. The claimed liability was based upon the provisions of sections 471 and 472, General Statutes of 1901, the same being sections 65 and 66 of the banking layL.(Laws 1879, ch. 47, §§ 1, 2), which, so far as they are necessary to be considered in this case, are as follows :

“It shall be unlawful for any president, director, manager, cashier, or other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Speer v. Dighton Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API