Legal Opinion

Noble v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1937No. 26158. En BancPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— In this cause, after the trial court had sustained demurrers interposed on all the statutory grounds to each of the three causes of action pleaded in the third amended complaint, the plaintiff elected to stand on that complaint and refused to plead further. A judgment of dismissal was entered, and from that judgment this appeal was taken.

Upon opening the oral argument in this court, the appellant’s attorney conceded that the demurrers to the second and third causes of action were properly sustained, and, as the filing of the third amended complaint waived any errors which may have been…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Gordon v. Rhodes & DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Robinson v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stenberg v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API