Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Clear Creek County District Court — Hon. H. Ashbaugh, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Quasi-public corporations are required to serve the inhabitants of the territory in which they operate, in the capacity for which they are organized, and in which they have secured a franchise, but have the right to prescribe for their convenience and security and the protection of the public such rules and regulations, with which their patrons must comply, as are reasonable and just. The reason for this rule is, that although gmsi-public corporations operating in cities, under a franchise obtained from municipal authorities, are organized for private gain, the consideration for permitting…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Golden Canal Co. v. BrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Haugen v. Albina Light & Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Little Pittsburg Con. Min. Co. v. Little Chief Con. Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Mills v. HartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Board of County Com'rs of Pitkin County v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Curry v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hicks v. City of Monroe Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.