Legal Opinion
Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 25, 2000No. 00-166 CPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on cross motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, Dynacs Engineering Company, Inc. (Dy-nacs), protests the decision of defendant, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA or agency or government), to award a contract to Federal Data Corporation (FDC or successful offeror) for Microgravity Research, Development and Operations ser*126vices. FDC is an intervenor in the proceeding.
In its Complaint, filed with this court on March 31, 2000, Dynacs challenges the contract award on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Afghan American Army Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- OAO Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.