Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1929No. 20442PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, C. J.

This is an original proceeding commenced in this court by the Maryland Casualty Company and Huston & Elliott to review an order of the State Industrial Commission awarding compensation to the respondent, S. J. Kent.

The respondent, Kent, while in the employ of the petitioners, Huston & Elliott, was injured by a dynamite explosion, resulting in injury to both eyes. No contention is made that the accident and resulting injuries do not come within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On the 11th day of May, 1929, the Commission entered its order finding that the claimant had a permanent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nease v. Hughes Stone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. B. & H. Passmore Metal & Roofing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. McMillinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Hughes Motor Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Briscoe Const. Co. v. ListermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API