Legal Opinion

Nease v. Hughes Stone Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1925No. 16265PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This action was commenced In this court by W. A. Nease, as petitioner, against the Hughes Stone Company. Associated Employers’ Reciprocal, James W. Gul-lett, and Clifford Ireland, and the State Industrial Commission, as respondents, to reverse and vacate an award made on the 7th day of March, 1925, awarding petitioner compensation for the loss of an eye, and denying petitioner compensation for total disability. The agreed statement of facts upon which this matter was heard is as follows:

“That W. A. Nease, claimant herein, was blind in one eye prior to his employment by the Hughes Stone…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Brightman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Branconnier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Weaver v. Maxwell Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API