Legal Opinion

Inland Construction Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1977No. 47007PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

The major issue raised on this appeal is whether an insurer must defend its insured under a standard form general liability policy of insurance when the insured is sued for converting personal property. We affirm the trial court’s finding, rendered in declaratory judgment proceedings, that the insured was not entitled to a defense since the pleadings, setting forth the tort of conversion, did not allege or claim property damage within the contemplation of insurance coverage.

Plaintiff, Inland Construction Corporation (Inland), is a Minnesota corporation engaged in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Crum v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Christian v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Clifford Ex Rel. CliffordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API