Christian v. Royal Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
These two cases were tried together to the court without a jury. .Judgment was ordered in favor of plaintiffs for $625.10 and $824.97, respectively. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The actions were for the recovery of amounts necessarily expended in defending the liability action hereinafter referred to. Plaintiffs claimed that action was one which defendants were obligated to defend under a policy issued to Christian, a dealer in farm implements and machinery, covering liability relative to a motor vehicle (truck). In .the policy the companies agreed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Oehme v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Minnesota Electric Distributing Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by49 opinions
- VAPPI & CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.