Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1990No. 89-1121PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The first issue before *26us is whether this case should be dismissed for relators’ failure to file a merit brief that comports with the Supreme Court Rules of Practice. Relators did not supply any argument beyond their memoranda in opposition to respondent’s motions. Thus, they clearly did not comply with the briefing schedule in Section 10, Rule VIII or the technical requirements of Rule Y (briefs must contain table of contents, propositions of law, etc.) that apply in original actions.

Respondent relies on State, ex rel. Queen City Chapter of Professional Journalists, v. McGinnis (1984), 10…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. KigerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Outlet Communications, Inc. v. Lancaster Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Drake v. BucherOhio Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Salemi v. Cleveland Metroparks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Clough v. Franklin Cty. Children Servs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re C.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API