Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Outlet Communications, Inc. v. Lancaster Police Department

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1988No. 87-1708PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The Public Records Law, R.C. 149.43(B), in pertinent part, provides that “[a]ll public records shall be promptly prepared and made available for inspection to any person at all reasonable times during regular business hours. * * *” More pointedly applicable to the questions of law presented here is the definition and exception section to this law, R.C. 149.43(A), which states in pertinent part:

“As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Public record’ means any record that is kept by any public office, including, but not limited to, state, county, city, village, township, and school district units, except…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Mothers Against Drunk Drivers v. GosserOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wooster Republican Printing Co. v. City of WoosterOhio Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. John R. Hicks v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Caledonian-Record Publishing Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API