Legal Opinion

Drake v. Bucher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1966No. 39651PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The brief of appellant utterly fails to comply with virtually every rule of this court both as to form and content. For the information of the bar, we call attention to its most salient deficiencies.

Omitted from the cover page, a matter purely and simply of mechanics, is the number of the case, the fact that the case originated in the Court of Appeals, and the names and addresses of counsel and whom they represent, all as required by Rule VI of the Rules of Practice. Rule VT provides further that “a dark colored cover page shall not be used.”

There is another mechanical requirement, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Charvat v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Sultaana v. Mansfield Corr. Inst.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Wellington v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API