Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio Precision Castings v. Bohman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1982No. 81-829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The decedent was employed in the heat treatment department of appellant’s facility. There, hot castings are removed from an oven and submerged in a tank containing water heated in excess of 150 degrees Fahrenheit. The tank is recessed into the floor except for 12 inches which extend above floor level. Located at the rear of the tank is a gas oven. Standard guardrailing was positioned in front of the tank; however, guardrailing had not been erected along either side of the tank. Two steel doors are hinged on opposite sides of the tank, each of which serves to cover one-half of the tank when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Questor Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API