Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-671Published

1ConcurrenceClifford F. Brown, J.

I concur in the judgment of this court and the analysis of the facts which results in affirmance of the court of appeals’ denial of a writ of mandamus to relator. Our decision properly causes the Industrial Commission’s award of fifteen percent permanent partial disability to stand undisturbed.

The award by the commission is based upon credible, reliable evidence. Thus, we do not need the crutch of the “some evidence” rule, State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396 [23 O.O.3d 358], as set forth in the second sentence of the per curiam opinion to support the commission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. GF Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Kilburn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API