Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1980No. 80-277PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has enunciated the “some evidence” rule recently in State, ex rel. Humble, v. Mark Concepts, Inc. (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 77, 79, as follows: *410“***[W]here the record contains some evidence to support the commission’s factual findings, these findings will not be disturbed. State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 283; State, ex rel. Capitol City Excavating Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 184, 188-189.”

The commission stated in its decision that it relied, inter alia, upon “evidence in the file.” Under R. C. 4123.10, the commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Capital City Excavating Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API