State ex rel. Cunningham v. Industrial Commission

The sole issue presented for review in this case is whether the Industrial Commission erred in denying relator’s claim that *75respondent violated IC-5-03.07(A) and (B). Cunningham urged below that Toledo Pickling had failed to comply with these provisions by failing to provide a means of disengaging the power supply of the welding machine within easy reach of the operator and by failing to provide a lock-out device for the controls or warning tags.

The Industrial Commission hearing officer found that no specific safety requirement was violated when Cunningham was injured. The hearing officer…