San Francisco Unified School District v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
— - Petitioner seeks mandamus to compel respondent superior court to order the production of certain reports made by a physician to the attorneys for John Earl Conner, real party in interest, 1 who has brought a personal injury action against petitioner. The physician who made the reports had operated on and treated Conner for the injury which is the subject of his action. We have concluded, for reasons hereinafter explained, that Conner’s contention that the reports are protected by the attorney-client privilege is without merit, and that the peremptory writ should issue.
In the complaint in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Coldwell v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by20 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.