Legal Opinion

Coldwell v. Board of Public Works

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1921No. S. F. No. 9694PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment and amend the conclusions of law. George E. Crothers, Judge. Judgment modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal by both petitioner, Colbert Coldwell, and defendants, the board of public works of the city and county of San Francisco, the individual members thereof, and M. M. 0 ’Shaughnessy, the city engineer, from a judgment granting, with certain exceptions, a petition to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco for a writ of mandate to compel the defendants to allow petitioner to view and take copies of certain documents and data in the office of the city engineer of the city and county of San Francisco, and by the petitioner from an order of the court denying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Egan v. Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Mushet v. Department of Public ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Stetler v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Whelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Moeller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. California State University, Fresno Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Linder v. EckardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API