Attorney Grievance Commission v. Middleton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
The petitioner, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against the respondent, Michael G. Middleton (Middleton), alleging misconduct arising out of Middleton’s representation of the persons respectively accused in four separate criminal cases over a two-year period. Based on Middleton’s default, the hearing judge found that Middleton had committed all of the violations charged, the most serious of which, intentional misrepresentation to a court, is evidenced by a judgment of criminal contempt. Middleton,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Banegura v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Maryland Lumber Co. v. Savoy Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZdravkovichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Baltimore Scrap Corp. v. David J. Joseph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.