Legal Opinion

Baltimore Scrap Corp. v. David J. Joseph Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2001No. 00-1141PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

This antitrust case stems from a protracted dispute over Baltimore Scrap Corp.’s attempt to install a scrap metal shredder in Baltimore, Maryland in 1991. Baltimore Scrap alleges that the. defendants violated the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1994), by surreptitiously financing litigation in state court in order to preveht or delay Baltimore Scrap’s entry into the market. The defendants argue that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine immunizes those who petition the courts from antitrust liability. The district court ruled that although the defendants’ conduct was wrong,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Mercatus Group, LLC v. Lake Forest HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 27Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. People Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API