Legal Opinion
Durflinger v. Baker
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1898No. 18,243PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellee, Baker, sued the appellant, Durfiinger, to recover upon a promissory note for $600.00, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for the enforcement of a vendor’s lien against certain real estate sold by Baker to Durfiinger, and for which, it was alleged, said note was executed. The appellant answered, first, that the note was executed for the purchase money for the appellee’s interest in the property and business of a partnership composed of the appellant and appellee, and that the consideration for said note had failed in part, owing to the fact that the appellant had agreed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. FehringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Mahoney v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Archibald v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Church v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Belshaw v. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baker v. State Bank of AkronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- State Bank v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Judah v. F. H. Cheyne Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Miller v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- John H. Hibben Dry Goods Co. v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.