John H. Hibben Dry Goods Co. v. Hicks
Indiana Court of Appeals
Appeal from tlie Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
Action in replevin, in which, appellant was plaintiff. Answer in three paragraphs and reply in one paragraph. Trial by the court; special finding of facts and conclusions of law.
Every question discussed may be decided and settled under the assignment of error which challenges the conclusions of law. The facts found which are essential to the decision of the case are as follows: Appellant is a corporation under the laws of Ohio, engaged in wholesaling of dry goods; prior to Hay 1, 1897, one Jennie Tincher, appellee’s assignor, had been engaged in carrying on a general store at Bloomington,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Powers v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Thompson v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shuey v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Wolfeld v. HanikaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932