Legal Opinion

Daniels v. MacGregor Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1965No. 38914PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Plaintiff’s first contention is that neither Section 35 of Article II of the Constitution nor Section 4123.74, Revised Code, bars a suit for personal injuries by a loaned servant against the employer to whom he is loaned.

However, in our opinion, previous decisions of this court require the following conclusion:

Where, as in the instant case, an employer employs an employee with the understanding that the employee is to be paid only by the employer and at a certain hourly rate to work for a customer of the employer and where it is understood that that customer is to have the right to control…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  2. Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co. v. ShachovskyOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bobik v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Behner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. American Stevedores Co v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Wright v. Habco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Campbell v. Central Terminal WarehouseOhio Supreme Court · 1978

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API