Legal Opinion

Bobik v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1946No. 30417PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The determination of this controversy becomes less difficult and the result is not surprising when it is observed, first, that the only witness called was the plaintiff himself and, second, that the defendant offered no evidence except an affidavit .signed by Muni who was the owner of the truck and a brother-in-law of the plaintiff.

By stipulation and by express admission the number of defenses has been reduced to one. The single question presented to and determined by the lower courts was whether the record contains evidence tending to show that the plaintiff was an employee of Aztec Lines,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gillum v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hanson v. KynastOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Daniels v. MacGregor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pusey v. BatorOhio Supreme Court · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API