Legal Opinion

George E. Failing Co. v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 2000No. 93,026PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

11 The dispositive issue tendered on cer-tiorari is whether the trial tribunal erred by failing to dichotomize the claimant's medical and hospital bill, pressed for employer's payment on Form 19, and to apply to each separated section that version of the authorized schedule of fees 2 [tariff] 3 which was in effect when the services to be compensated were rendered. 4 For the reasons to be stat ed we answer the question in the affirmative. Because we hold that the trial tribunal erred (a) by mot applying both versions of the legislatively authorized tariff and (b) in its view of the governing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API