Legal Opinion

Kaus v. Huston

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 17, 1940No. 22, CivPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff is a resident and engaged in business at the city of Council Bluffs, Iowa, and is the owner of a line of taxicabs with a central garage, shop and office with telephone equipment connected with ten outlying stations maintained for communication with taxicab drivers. That the defendant is the Collector of Internal Revenue for 'the District of Iowa.

2. Plaintiff’s taxicab line consists of ten cabs, which are operated in two twelve hour shifts per day, from 6 A. M. to 6 P. M., and from 6 P. M. to 6 A. M. That the cabs are operated by twenty men,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Huston v. Iowa Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. ExleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Morgan Cab Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Party Cab Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API