Legal Opinion
Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2004No. 03-15715PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Armando Castillo, an Arizona prisoner, appeals the District Court’s dis*884missal' of his amended petition for habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Castillo’s amended petition alleges the Arizona trial court denied Castillo “a fair trial in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments” of the U.S. Constitution by permit; ting the jury to view what he contends was a highly prejudicial videotape of his interrogation. We conclude that Castillo failed to exhaust his state court remedies and affirm the District Court’s dismissal of his petition.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Thompson v. PaulDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Vignolo v. IgnacioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Mitcham v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.