Legal Opinion
Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 2005No. 03-15715PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
399 F.3d 993
Armando CASTILLO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
James McFADDEN; Arizona Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 03-15715.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2004.
Opinion Filed June 1, 2004.
Amended February 24, 2005.
Anders V. Rosenquist, Jr., and Florence M. Bruemmer, Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner-appellant.
John L. Saccoman, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for the respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jesse Andrews v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- (HC) Betz v. AngleaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Otto v. TampkinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019