Mitcham v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Mark L. Mitcham, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of *644his habeas corpus petition, which challenges his conviction and sentence for child molestation and sexual conduct with a minor. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.
Mitcham contends that his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated because a witness’ testimony amounted to prosecutorial misconduct that denied him due process. See Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181, 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471, 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986); Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitcham v. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005