Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Paul

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 30, 2009No. CV 05-990-PHX-MHMPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.

Currently before the Court is Defendant Capitol Detective Agency, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 104), and Defendants Lewis and Roca LLP, George Paul, Tom Morgan, and Scott Dewald’s (and their respective spouses) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 105). Also before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. # 118) and Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. # 119). After reviewing the pleadings and hearing oral argument on May 20, 2009, the Court issues the following order.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1

From January 2001 through May…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. Opus Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Communication Management Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  3. McDaniel v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Aluisi v. JorgensenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API