Crozier v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Superior Judge.
This is a suit by the appellant, a taxpayer, hereafter designated plaintiff, against the appellees, Secretary of State, et ah, hereafter designated defendants. The facts are not in dispute. In the year 1933 the legislature made a lump sum appropriation for the Office of Secretary of State for the fiscal years 1933-34 and 1934-35 in the aggregate amount of $44,458, for salaries and wages; for printing session laws; for operation; for initiative and referendum expense. Defendant James H. Kerby, the then secretary of state, used the entire appropriation with the exception…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kerby v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- State of Arizona v. Yuma Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Windes v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Byrne v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Millett v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Pena v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Van Riper v. ThreadgillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. BowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.