Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1947No. 4864PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Superior Judge.

This is a suit by the appellant, a taxpayer, hereafter designated plaintiff, against the appellees, Secretary of State, et ah, hereafter designated defendants. The facts are not in dispute. In the year 1933 the legislature made a lump sum appropriation for the Office of Secretary of State for the fiscal years 1933-34 and 1934-35 in the aggregate amount of $44,458, for salaries and wages; for printing session laws; for operation; for initiative and referendum expense. Defendant James H. Kerby, the then secretary of state, used the entire appropriation with the exception…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerby v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State of Arizona v. Yuma Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Windes v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Byrne v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Millett v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pena v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Van Riper v. ThreadgillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. BowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API