Legal Opinion

Millett v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1948No. 5015PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to determine the question as to whether any funds are available for the payment of plaintiff’s claim for services rendered to the Arizona Corporation Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) in the matter of a proposed rate survey to be conducted by it.

The facts necessary to a determination of the matter are as follows: Plaintiff-appellant, a certified public accountant engaged in practice in Phcenix, Maricopa, County, Arizona, on April 21, 1947, entered into a contract with the Commission to make an examination of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Williams v. Standard Oil Co. of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Fairfield v. FosterArizona Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. PandeliArizona Supreme Court · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API