Legal Opinion

Windes v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1931No. Civil No. 3067PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FICKETT, Superior Judge.

The state legislature in 1927 increased the' salary of the judges of the Supreme Court, and in 1929 increased the salaries of the judges of the superior courts, including Maricopa county, and of the members of the corporation commission. But in conformity with the state Constitution these increases could not take effect as to the occupants of these offices until after they had again presented themselves for election; the above-mentioned courts and commission being continuing bodies, the terms of the members of which are not coterminous.

Section 17, part 2, of article 4…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Humbert v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Civil Service Commission v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Forty-Seventh Legislature v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Millett v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API