Legal Opinion
Amaker v. Weiner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 3, 1999No. Docket No. 98-2415PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Anthony Amaker appeals from a judgment of the district court (Seybert, J.) dismissing his amended complaint. In substance, the amended complaint alleges that police, prosecutors, plaintiffs defense attorneys, the trial judge, an eyewitness, and various court personnel conspired to secure plaintiffs conviction on charges of murder by manufacturing inculpatory evidence and subsequently suppressing evidence probative of their misconduct, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985(3) and 1986. Plaintiff ultimately was convicted in New York state court on two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- John Boyd v. Neal B. Biggers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Vaher v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kathryn Strom v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. And Goldman, Sachs & Co. Supplemental Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Amaker v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Courtenay Communications Corporation v. Patricia Hall and Hallmark Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Lennon v. SeamanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.