Legal Opinion
Amaker v. Weiner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 3, 1999No. 98-2415PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
179 F.3d 48,
Anthony D. AMAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jay WEINER, George Kenney, Michael Schurr, Michael Juviler,
Celeste Redmond, Anthony Crothers, Frank Lopez, Richard
Shiarella, Frances Napoli, Virginia Modest, Wilbur Levin,
Gabriel Plumer, Michael A. Arce, and Pamela Hirschhorn,
Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 98-2415.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued May 5, 1999.
Decided June 3, 1999.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert, J.) dismissing appellant's amended complaint. Remanded with instructions to modify the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- John Boyd v. Neal B. Biggers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- David W. Lanier v. Ed BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Friedl v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Friedl v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Marcos Poventud v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.