Legal Opinion

Kathryn Strom v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. And Goldman, Sachs & Co. Supplemental Life Insurance Plan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 24, 1999No. 1998PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs late husband applied to purchase certain group life insurance upon his employment by defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”). The application was approved, but Goldman’s alleged negligence in dealing with the application delayed its effective date until four days after the death of the insured. Plaintiff here seeks reversal of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jed S. Rakoff, Judge, dismissing her complaint against the benefit plan and Goldman.

I

This case comes to us on appeal from an order entered on…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Devlin v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Tamyra S. Bowerman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated and Associates' Health and Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. State of Connecticut v. Physicians Health Services of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Coan v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API